Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 9 No. 1.3 (2020)
Scholar : National School of Leadership

Research Articles

An Analytical Study on the Evolution of Education as a Discipline

Published 2020-04-25

  • Dr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav
AK College, Shikohabad, U.P. India

Abstract

The unique development of life on earth is human beings. Since their origin, their greater curiosity always encouraged them to speculate about the operation of the universe and to remain engaged in constant search of knowledge. Knowledge involves acquiring knowledge, facts, information, descriptions or abilities through experience or study. The argument provided deals with criticism of education as an academic subject with epistemological problems. The argument consists of a study that has classified the education field as based on three basic knowledge traditions. Contrasts with other disciplines, including mathematics and physics, are created to study the coherence of education as a field. The paper also examines the academic scholarship in regard to, and its significance to, the notion of near-practice education research as an academic field. The article concludes by suggesting a new model that shows the relationships between practical knowledge and academic knowledge that are an intrinsic part of education. There is also a stronger representation of education as an academic field.

Keywords

Education, Discipline, Evolution, Knowledge

Article Full Text

References

  1. A.Krishnan (2009), what are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate. Reterieved June 25, 2011
  2. Amunga, H. (2019) “SHORTFALL OF CURRENT GLOBAL EDUCATION SYSTEMS”, IARS’ International Research Journal. Vic. Australia, 9(2). doi: 10.51611/iars.irj.v9i2.2019.101.
  3. Carr, W. (June 2006). Education without Theory, British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp.136-159
  4. Douglas W. Vick (2004). Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law, Journal of Law and Society 31(2), p. 172.
  5. Favero, M. D. (2003). Academic disciplines, In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education New York: Macmillan. pp. 9-14
  6. G. Biesta (2009). Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity in the Academic Study of Education: Comparing Traditions of Educational Theorising, Retrieved May 19, 2010
  7. I.Palaiologou, (July 2010). The Death of a Discipline or the Birth of a Tran discipline: Subverting Questions of Disciplinarily within Education Studies Undergraduate Courses, Educational Studies, V.36 No. 3, pp. 269-282, Retrieved April 10, 2012
  8. Jagathkar, A. and Jain, D. (2020) “Digitized Education: A New Social Divide between Rural and Urban India”, IARS’ International Research Journal. Vic. Australia, 10(1). doi: 10.51611/iars.irj.v10i1.2020.115.
  9. Jain, D. (2019) “DON’T KILL INNOVATION: CONCEPT TOWARDS A NEW ACADEMIC WORLD”, IARS’ International Research Journal. Vic. Australia, 9(1). doi: 10.51611/iars.irj.v9i1.2019.98.
  10. Stichweh, R. (2001). History of Scientific Disciplines in Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 13727-13731.
  11. Swanson, R.A. (2007). Theory Framework for Applied Disciplines: Boundaries, Contributing, Core, Useful, Novel, and Irrelevant Components, Retrieved August 21, 2011
  12. U.C. Vashishtha, (January, 2010) Education: A Discipline in Making, DEI FOERA, Third Annual Issue, and Agra: Dayalbagh Educational Institute, pp. 19-21.
  13. Vashishtha, U.C. (2010). Education: A Discipline in Making, DEI FOERA, Third Annual Issue: January, 2010, Agra: Dayalbagh Educational Institute, pp. 19-21.
  14. W. Vick Douglas (2004). Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law, Journal of Law and Society 31(2), p. 172.
  15. Yero, J. (2002). How Teacher Thinking Shapes Education. Retrieved May 05, 2013