OPJU Business Review

Research Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): OPJU Business Review

First Impression Is the Last Impression: How A Smart CV is Built?

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63825/hgywks44
Submitted
6 August 2025
Published
23 May 2022

Abstract

Following the recently broke pandemic, every organization in the globe is dealing with a global crisis in the varied fields. This has necessitated the need for improved and advanced working methods to cope with the losses incurred. As a result, alternative work modes are to be looked for to increase productivity. Does opting for remote or hybrid work mode increases employees’ productivity or is it making employees unproductive? Hence, the purpose of this study is to (a) identify employees’ most preferred mode of work; (b) identify employee productivity in case of remote or hybrid work mode of work.  In order to seek answer to the above questions, a systematic literature review was conducted reviewing 20 research papers, which includes studies related new normal culture of opting remote or hybrid work mode. While reviewing the research on alternative mode of work, it became observed that almost all of personnel have coped up well to the work from home (WFH) culture and intend to continue with the same that actually has helped in increased employee productivity. The paper concludes with setting out potential research paths, allowing practitioners and academician to do additional research.

References

  1. Abernathy, T. V., and Vineyard, R. N. (2001). Academic competitions in science: What are the rewards for students? The Clearing House, 74(5), 269-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650109599206
  2. Barr, T.F. and McNeilly, K.M. (2002) The Value of Students’ Classroom Experience from the Eyes of the Recruiter: Information, Implications, and Recommendations for Marketing Recruiters. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 168-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302242010
  3. Callahan, J. L. (2010). Constructing a Manuscript: Distinguishing Integrative Literature Reviews and Conceptual and Theory Articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 300–304. doi:10.1177/1534484310371492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371492
  4. Cheung, Terence Chun-Ho; Silva, Thushari; Kwok, Ron Chi-Wai; Wang, Kitty Wan- Ching. (2015). Perceived Importance of Portfolios in a Smart CV after an Education Reform: An Empirical Analysis. Paper presented at 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
  5. Finch, D. J., Hamilton, L. K., Baldwin, R., & Zehner, M. (2013). An exploratory study of factors affecting undergraduate employability. Education + Training, 55(7), 681–704. doi:10.1108/et-07-2012-0077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2012-0077
  6. Finch, D. J., Hamilton, L., Baldwin, R., and Zehner, M. (2013). Portfolio assessment and new paradigms: New instruments and new places. Educational Forum, 59, 22-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729409336359
  7. Gati, I., Gadassi, R., Saka, N., Hadadi, Y., Ansenberg, N., Friedmann, R., & Asulin-Peretz, L. (2011). Emotional and personality-related aspects of career decision-making difficulties: Facets of career indecisiveness. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 3–20. doi:10.1177/ 1069072710382525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710382525
  8. Gault, J., Leach, E., & Duey, M. (2010). Effects of business internships on job marketability: the employers’ perspective. Education + Training, 52(1), 76–88. doi:10.1108/00400911011017690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017690
  9. Grady, D. A. (2006). Indirect measures: Internships, competitions, and careers. In W. G. Christ (Ed.), Assessing media education: A resource handbook for educators and administrators (pp. 349–371). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315096780-4
  10. Housego, S. and Parker, N. (2009). Positioning ePortfolios in an integrated curriculum. Education + Training, 51(5/6), 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910910987219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910910987219
  11. Knouse, S., and Fontenot, G. (2008). Benefits of the business college internship: A research review. Journal of Employment Counseling, 45(2), 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2008.tb00045.x
  12. Liberati, A., et al. (2009) The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematica Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. British Medical Journal, 339, b2700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
  13. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Hill, P. W., and Wan, T. (2006). Assessment reforms in Hong Kong. 32nd IAEA Conference, Singapore.
  14. Maiworm, F., and Teichler, U. (1996). Study Abroad and Early Career: Experiences of Former ERASMUS Students. Higher Education Policy Series 35. ERASMUS Monograph No. 21. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  15. Mohajeri Norris E, Gillespie J. (2009). How Study Abroad Shapes Global Careers: Evidence From the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education. 13(3):382-397. doi:10.1177/1028315308319740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308319740
  16. Torraco, R.J. (2005) Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
  17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)