Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): OPJU Business Review

Uncovering the latent structure of the logistics performance index: A principal component approach

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63825/opjubr.2026.5.1.955
Submitted
22 February 2026
Published
11 July 2026

Abstract

This study examines the statistical structure and dimensional properties of the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) using 672 country-year observations. Descriptive results indicate moderate average logistics performance (Mean = 3.033) with substantial cross-country heterogeneity, particularly in infrastructure quality and customs efficiency. Pairwise correlations among the six LPI components are exceptionally high (r = 0.806–0.980, p < .001), suggesting strong linear dependence. Variance Inflation Factor diagnostics confirm severe multicollinearity, with four indicators exceeding the critical threshold of 10. To address this issue, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is applied. The first principal component explains 90.86% of the total variance (eigenvalue = 5.451) and exhibits uniformly strong positive loadings across all indicators (0.387–0.419), indicating a single dominant dimension of logistics performance. The findings demonstrate that LPI components capture overlapping aspects of a unified latent construct rather than distinct independent dimensions. The study provides methodological justification for dimensionality reduction in LPI-based econometric modeling and highlights the necessity of integrated logistics policy interventions.

References

  1. Arvis, J.-F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., Raj, A., & Naula, T. (2016). Connecting to compete 2016: Trade logistics in the global economy (The Logistics Performance Index and its indicators). World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/25168/106646-WP-P157496-PUBLIC-World-Bank-LPI.pdf
  2. Arvis, J.-F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to compete 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy- The Logistics Performance Index and its indicators. World Bank https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/576061531492034646/ pdf/Connecting-to-compete-2018-trade-logistics-in-the-global-economy-the-logistics-performance-index-and-its-indicators.pdf
  3. Calderón, C., & Servén, L. (2010). Infrastructure and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 19(suppl_1), i13–i87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejp022
  4. Djankov, S., Freund, C., & Pham, C. S. (2010). Trading on time. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 166–173. The Review of Economics and Statistics https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2009.11498 (Working-paper precursor: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3909. See World Bank repository for earlier draft.)
  5. Hummels, D., & Schaur, G. (2013). Time as a trade barrier. American Economic Review, 103(7), 2935–2959. American Economic Review https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.7.2935
  6. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b98835
  7. Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2065), Article 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
  8. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
  9. Felipe, J., Kumar, U., & Abdon, A. (2020). Using principal component analysis for composite index construction. Social Indicators Research 150(2), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02321-0
  10. Portugal-Perez, A., & Wilson, J. S. (2012). Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure. World Development, 40(7), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.002 (Working paper version: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5261
  11. Martí, L., Puertas, R., & García, L. (2014). The importance of the Logistics Performance Index in international trade. Applied Economics, 46(24), 2982–2992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.916394
  12. Shepherd, B. (2016). Infrastructure, trade facilitation and network connectivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Trade, 3(1–2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2017.05.001

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

21-24 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.