Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): OPJU Business Review

Trajectory Prediction in Vehicular Environment using AI: A Review

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63825/opjubr.2023.2.1.827
Submitted
7 August 2025
Published
24 April 2023

Abstract

A vehicular network is an assisting technology that supports many applications. Safety is one of the most crucial among all the applications. Vehicles generally exchange emergency messages through direct communication. But in the real world, this type of communication is not possible to build among vehicles because of obstacles that can be static or dynamic. This situation is normally called non-line of sight. As a researcher, we aim to develop an approach for improving awareness among neighboring vehicles, reducing latency and mean square error rates. In this paper, we describe various methodologies related to vehicular network systems. Deliberation of various techniques with different datasets and corresponding performance metrics for improving the system performance are described here. Keywords: Trajectory, Prediction, Vehicular, VANET.

References

  1. Shirazi, M. S., & Morris, B. T. (January 2017). Looking at intersections: A survey of intersection monitoring, behaviour and safety analysis of recent studies. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2568920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2568920
  2. Liang, L., Ye, H., & Li, G. Ye. (June 2019). Toward Intelligent Vehicular Networks: A Machine Learning Framework. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2872122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2872122
  3. Wiest, J., Höffken, M., Kresel, U., & Dietmayer, K. (June 2012). Probabilistic trajectory prediction with Gaussian mixture models. In Proceedings of the Intell. Veh. Symp. (pp. 141–146). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2012.6232277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2012.6232277
  4. Le Liang, H. P., Li, G. Ye., Shen, X. (S.), Shen, X., . . . Shen, X. (2017). Vehicular communications: A physical layer perspective. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(12), 10647–10659- 10659, Dec.. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2750903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2750903
  5. Wang, Y., Menkovski, V., Ho, I. W., & Pechenizkiy, M. (May 2019). VANET meets deep learning: The effect of packet loss on the object detection performance. In Proceedings of the IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCSpring.2019.8746657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCSpring.2019.8746657
  6. Gahlan, D., & Pandove, G. A Review on various issues, challenges and different methodologies in vehicular environment. In. SSRN Electronic Journal. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications (ICICC). http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606267
  7. Yousefi, S., Mousavi, M. S., & Fathy, M. (June 2006). Vehicular ad hoc Networks (VANETs): Challenges and perspectives. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference its Telecommunication (pp. 761–766). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2006.289012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2006.289012
  8. Liang, W., Li, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, S., & Bie, R. (2015). Vehicular adhoc networks: Architectures, research issues, methodologies, challenges and trends. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, article in Big Data and Knowledge Extraction for Cyber- Physical Systems,, 11(8, August). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/745303
  9. Xue, H., Huynh, D. Q., & Reynolds, M. (March 2018). SSLSTM: A hierarchical LSTM model for pedestrian trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (pp. 1186–1194). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2018.00135
  10. Park, S. H., Kim, B., Kang, C. M., Chung, C. C., & Choi, J. W. (June 2018). Sequence-to-sequence prediction of vehicle trajectory via LSTM encoder-decoder architecture. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Veh. Symp. (pp. 1672–1678). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500658
  11. Indrabayu, R. Y., & Bakti, I. S. Areni, and A.A. Prayogi, “Vehicle detection and tracking using Gaussian Mixture Model and Kalman Filter,” in Proc. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Cybernetics, pp. 115–119. (November 2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberneticsCom.2016.7892577
  12. Ali, S. T., Goyal, K., & Singhai, J. (October 2017). Moving object detection using self adaptive Gaussian mixture model for real time applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Innovations Is Signal Processing and Embedded Systems (RISE2017) (pp. 153–156). https://doi.org/10.1109/RISE.2017.8378144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RISE.2017.8378144
  13. Tian, Y., Zhang, K., Li, J., Lin, X., & Yang, B. (November 2018). LSTM-based traffic flow prediction with missing data. Neurocomputing, 318, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.067
  14. Dai, S., Li, L., & Li, Z. (March 2019). Modeling vehicle interactions via modified LSTM models for trajectory prediction. IEEE Access, 7, 38287–38296. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907000
  15. Wang, C., Ma, L., Li, R., Durrani, T. S., & Zhang, H. (June 2019). Exploring trajectory prediction through machine learning methods. IEEE Access, 7, 101441–101452. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929430

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.