Advances in Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

Authors

  • Sanjay Singh O.P. Jindal University, Chhattisgarh (INDIA)
  • Deepa Jain Nirmal Integrated Consultancy (Team-NIC), (INDIA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62431/rq1wt028

Keywords:

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), Environmental pollutants, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), Corrosion, Spalling

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has emerged as a highly significant interdisciplinary field within civil, mechanical, aerospace, and structural engineering, dedicated to the continuous or periodic assessment of the integrity, safety, and performance of engineering structures throughout their operational lifespan. The primary objective of SHM is to ensure early detection of damage, degradation, or abnormal behavior in structural systems, thereby preventing catastrophic failures and enhancing long-term reliability and sustainability of infrastructure. In recent decades, the field has undergone a major transformation driven by rapid advancements in sensing technologies, computational intelligence, communication systems, and data-driven methodologies. Traditionally, structural assessment relied heavily on manual inspections, visual evaluations, and scheduled maintenance routines, which were often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and limited in accuracy due to human subjectivity and intermittent data collection. However, the emergence of advanced sensor networks and non-destructive evaluation techniques has enabled continuous data acquisition from structures in real time. These developments have significantly improved the ability to monitor critical parameters such as strain, stress, vibration, displacement, temperature variation, and material fatigue under varying environmental and operational conditions. One of the most transformative innovations in SHM is the development of digital twin technology, which creates a real-time virtual replica of physical structures. Digital twins enable engineers to simulate different loading conditions, predict structural responses, and evaluate potential failure scenarios in a virtual environment, thereby supporting proactive maintenance and optimized decision-making. When combined with real-time sensor data, digital twins provide a dynamic and continuously updated representation of structural behavior. Modern SHM frameworks are now widely applied across critical infrastructure systems, including bridges, high-rise buildings, dams, tunnels, offshore platforms, aircraft, and industrial machinery. These systems play a crucial role in enhancing public safety, minimizing maintenance costs, optimizing resource allocation, and extending the operational lifespan of structures. Furthermore, SHM technologies contribute significantly to disaster prevention by enabling early warning systems for structural failures caused by natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and extreme weather events. This article provides a comprehensive review of recent advances in SHM techniques, focusing on emerging technologies such as AI-driven analytics, IoT-enabled sensor networks, fiber optic sensing systems, and digital twin integration. It also discusses practical applications across various engineering domains, identifies current limitations, and highlights future research directions aimed at developing more intelligent, autonomous, and cost-effective structural monitoring systems.

References

A. Mardanshahi et al., “Sensing techniques for structural health monitoring: A state-of-the-art review on performance criteria and new-generation technologies,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 1424, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25051424.

L. A. Bull, P. Gardner, T. J. Rogers, E. J. Cross, N. Dervilis, and K. Worden, “Probabilistic inference for structural health monitoring,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021.

A. M. Davis, M. M. Mirsayar, and D. J. Hartl, “A novel structural health monitoring approach using magnetic shape memory alloys,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 311, p. 125212, 2021.

G. Yadav, “A comparative study of intelligent online e-learning systems,” IARS’ International Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.51611/iars.irj.v13i01.2023.236.

S. Hassani, M. Mousavi, and A. H. Gandomi, “Structural health monitoring in composite structures: A comprehensive review,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 153, 2022.

Y. Huang, J. L. Beck, S. Wu, and H. Li, “Robust Bayesian compressive sensing for SHM signals,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014.

A. Kamariotis, E. Chatzi, and D. Straub, “A framework for quantifying the value of vibration-based SHM,” Engineering Structures, 2022.

M. K. David, A. Ali, and S. Hussain, “Resilience by Sindhi protagonists in tryst with Koki,” IARS’ International Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.51611/iars.irj.v15i01.2025.261.

A. Mardanshahi, A. Sreekumar, X. Yang, S. K. Barman, and D. Chronopoulos, “Sensing techniques for structural health monitoring: A state-of-the-art review on performance criteria and new-generation technologies,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 1424, 2025.

N. Deepalakshmi, “Exploring online shopping trends and customer experiences in the digital age,” IARS’ International Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.51611/iars.irj.v15i01.2025.258.

O. S. David-West et al., “A review of structural health monitoring techniques as applied to composite structures,” Structural Durability & Health Monitoring, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 91–147, 2017, doi: 10.3970/sdhm.2017.011.091.

S. Patel and N. Verma, “Machine learning approaches in SHM systems,” Journal of Consortium Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 2023.

F. Potenza, C. Rinaldi, E. Ottaviano, and V. Gattulli, “Robotics and computer-aided defect evaluation in SHM,” Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2020.

M. Rossi and D. Bournas, “Structural health monitoring and management of cultural heritage structures: A review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6450, 2023.

S. Hassani, M. Mousavi, and A. H. Gandomi, “Structural health monitoring in composite structures: A comprehensive review,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 153, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s22010153.

V. Sharma and A. Mehta, “Wireless sensor networks for smart infrastructure monitoring,” JConsortium International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 101–108, 2021.

X. Tang, H. Zhao, and S. Mandal, “Programmable CMOS transceiver for structural health monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 2018.

V. B. Sharma et al., “Review of structural health monitoring techniques in pipeline and wind turbine industries,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 59, 2021, doi: 10.3390/asi4030059.

Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, and X. Tan, “Review on vibration-based structural health monitoring techniques and technical codes,” Symmetry, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 1998, 2021, doi: 10.3390/sym13111998.

S. Ye, X. Lai, I. Bartoli, and A. E. Aktan, “Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering,” Automation in Construction, vol. 136, p. 104168, 2022.

Z. Yang et al., “A review on guided-ultrasonic-wave-based structural health monitoring: From fundamental theory to machine learning techniques,” Ultrasonics, vol. 133, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.107014.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Advances in Structural Health Monitoring Techniques . (2026). IARS’ Knowledge Planet, 979-8-25-892166-6. https://doi.org/10.62431/rq1wt028

Similar Articles

11-20 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)