Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 26 No. 01 (2026): Enigma : The Multidisciplinary International Journal

ITERATIVE CLOSEST POINTS ALGORITHM BASED ON CLIMATE CHANGE RAINFALL FORECASTING

Cite this as:
Enigma : The Multidisciplinary International Journal 2026 ;Vol. 26
Published
2026-02-17

Summary

Prediction of rainfall is indeed an essential assignment in today’s world. Agricultural sector principally depends upon the water concluded from the rainfall for filling up the need of water for crop cultivation. Abnormal rainfall always leads to the crisis for the agricultural sector. The effect of unfavorable rainfall can be minimized by accurately predicting it and so on time. A novel solution called Dynamic Regional Combined short-term rainfall Forecasting approach using Multi-layer Perceptron. First, Principal Component Analysis is used to reduce the dimension of thirteen physical factors, which serves as the input of MLP. Second, an Iterative Closest Points algorithm is applied to determine the structure of MLP. The surrounding sites are perceived based on the forecasting site. Finally, to solve the clutter interference which is caused by the extension of the perception range, DRCF is enhanced with several dynamic strategies. Experiments are conducted on data from dataset and we compare DRCF with atmospheric models and other machine learning approaches. The experimental results show that DRCF outperforms existing approaches in both threat score and root mean square error.

References

  1. [1] M. D. Crown, “Validation of the NOAA space weather prediction center’s solar flare forecasting look-up table and forecaster-issued probabilities,” Space Weather, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1–4, 2022.
  2. [2] K. R. Moran, G. Fairchild, N. Generous, K. Hickmann, D. Osthus, R. Priedhorsky, J. Hyman, and S. Y. Del Valle, “Epidemic forecasting is messier than weather forecasting: The role of human behavior and internet data streams in epidemic forecast,” The Journal of infectious diseases, vol. 214, no. suppl 4, pp. S404–S408, 2021.
  3. [3] C. W. Zheng, C. Y. Li, X. Chen, and J. Pan, “Numerical forecasting experiment of the wave energy resource in the China sea,” vol. 2016, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2021.
  4. [4] K. C. Luk, J. E. Ball, and A. Sharma, “An application of artificial neural networks for rainfall forecasting,” Mathematical Computer Modelling, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 683–693, 2020.
  5. [5] K. W. Appel, R. C. Gilliam, N. Davis, A. Zubrow, and S. C. Howard, “Overview of the atmospheric model evaluation tool (MET) v1.1 for evaluating meteorological and air quality models,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 434–443, 2011. [6] N. Bartoletti, F. Casagli, S. Marsili-Libelli, A. Nardi, and L. Palandri, “Data-driven rainfall/runoff modelling based on a neurofuzzy inference system,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 106, pp. 35–47, 2018.
  6. [7] L. Cozzi, “Weather models as virtual sensors to data driven rainfall predictions in urban watersheds,” EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 15, pp. 111–115, 2013.
  7. [8] K. Sudheer, A. Gosain, and K. Ramasastri, “A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models,” Hydrological processes, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1325–1330, 2022.
  8. [9] R. J. Schalkoff, Artificial neural networks, vol. 1. McGraw-Hill New York, 1997. [10] X. Glorot and Y. Bengio, “Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks,” vol. 9, pp. 249–256, 2019.
  9. [11] J. Schmidhuber, “Deep learning in neural networks: An overview,” Neural networks, vol. 61, pp. 85–117, 2015.
  10. [12] D. Ciregan, U. Meier, and J. Schmidhuber, “Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification,” in Computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE conference on, pp. 3642–3649, IEEE, 2018.
  11. [13] R. Collobert and J. Weston, “A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning,” in Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, pp. 160–167, ACM, 2008.
  12. [14] G. Hinton, L. Deng, D. Yu, G. E. Dahl, A.-r. Mohamed, N. Jaitly, A. Senior, V. Vanhoucke, P. Nguyen, T. N. Sainath, et al., “Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 82–97, 2012.
  13. [15] S. Ergezinger and E. Thomsen, “An accelerated learning algorithm for multilayer perceptrons: optimization layer by layer,” IEEE Transactions on neural networks, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 1995.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.