STUDY ON THE ESSENTIALS PARTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING

Authors

  • Sanjay Kumar Yadav AK College Shikohabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55054/ajpp.v1i1.460

Keywords:

Cooperative Learning, Teaching Pedagogy

Abstract

Over the previous decade, cooperative learning has arisen as the main new way to deal with study hall guidance. One significant justification its support is that various examination concentrates in K–12 study halls, in assorted school settings and across a wide scope of content regions, have uncovered that understudies finishing cooperative learning bunch jobs will in general have higher scholastic grades, higher selfesteem, more prominent quantities of positive social abilities, less generalizations of people of different races or ethnic gatherings, and more noteworthy cognizance of the substance and abilities they are concentrating Furthermore, the viewpoint of understudies functioning as "scholarly introverts" in homerooms is altogether different from that of understudies working cooperatively and cooperatively in and as "cooperative learning scholarly groups" Even with it's anything but, a larger part of the gathering assignments that instructors use, even educators who guarantee to utilize "cooperative learning," keep on being cooperative gathering undertakings not cooperative learning bunch errands. For example, virtually all "jigsaw" exercises are not cooperative learning jigsaw exercises. Just on the grounds that understudies work in little gatherings doesn't imply that they are collaborating to guarantee their own learning and the learning of all others in their This accentuation on scholarly learning accomplishment for every person and all individuals from the gathering is one element that isolates cooperative learning bunches from other gathering undertakings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, E.R.(2012). The effects of cooperative learning on the achievement and self-esteem levels of students in the inclusive classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International-56/05,P.1741.

Ahuja, A.(2013). The effects of a cooperative learning instructional strategy on the academic achievement attitudes towards science class and process skills of middle school science students. Dissertation Abstracts International-A55/10,P.3149.

Anderson, D., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, J., & Johnson R.T.(2015). Effects of cooperative versus individualized instruction on student pro-social behavior, attitudes toward learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,68(4),446-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.4.446

Parker, R. (2014). Small-group cooperative learning. The Education Digest, 51, 44-46.

Sharan, S. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2013). A group investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom. In S. Sharon (Ed.), Cooperation in Education. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press

Slavin, R. (2013). Student teams and achievement divisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 39-49.

Slavin, R. (1981). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 38(8), 655-660.

Slavin, R. (2014). Students motivating students to excel: Cooperative incentives, cooperative tasks, and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 53--63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461391

Slavin, R. (2015). Using Student Team Learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Webb, N. (2015). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Plenum.

Published

2021-12-29

How to Cite

Yadav, S. K. (2021) “STUDY ON THE ESSENTIALS PARTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING”, Amity Journal of Professional Practices. Florida, USA, 1(01). doi: 10.55054/ajpp.v1i1.460.

Citations